Rebuttal To Dr Klopp's Presention at BEMER Convention
Bryant Meyers Scientific Comparison of IMRS 2000 vs BEMER
Dr Klopp's Rebuttal To Bryant's Video
Bryant's Rebuttal To What Klopp Says:
1) Biorhythm Clock - Klopp: Show me the scientific research, this is unscientific? My Response: How is that unscientific?? Not a different world? Brain Is resonant system that can be entrained. Brain state frequencies VERY well established.
2) Intensity - Klopp: Says Field always goes through your body, you always get enough. Intensity does not matter. My Response: I actually agree with what he says in general, but intensity DOES matter a little. Having lower intensity IS a benefit to sensitive people and having higher intensity helps with pain relief.
How is it nonsense? These are from the specs in BEMER guide. Not the level of energy but the quality of the signal. The decisive point is the quality of the signal.
3) 0-50 Hz... Klopp: Dismisses as unscientific. Show me the studies he says. My Response: There actually is substantial research on 0-50 Hz. See attached.
5) BEMER signal... Klopp: What is this, this is old signal, now I am getting really upset. My Response: This is all I see online... Do an image search for BEMER signal and THIS is what appears on many BEMER websites. I actually tried to find the so called new signal and have not seen anything different ANYWHERE!
6) Rapid Rise and Fall, and striking flint analogy Klopp: Laughs and says this is unscientific and ridiculous My Response: This is a metaphor for Faraday's Law of Induction. At the end of the video he even said it is good to make things simple so people can understand. Using Faraday's equation would lose people. This is an ACCURATE metaphor based on PHYSICS. Another analogy is swiping a credit card. You need to swipe QUICKLY. This is faradays law... Faster swipe = bigger signal.
He further says... We do not need to interact on this level on nonsense... But they DO!!!
7) About Basset Research with sawtooth Klopp: Yesterday was yesterday, today is today. My response: Yesterdays research is VERY applicable unless proven wrong. It is ridiculous to think we cannot use research from 10 to 20 years ago, as scientists do that all the time.
8) About tightly wound coils and Pure B- field Harmonics. Klopp: says unscientific show me studies. What is this Clean and dirty signals. My response: PURE magnetic fields is physics. You DO get a purer B-field (magnetic field) with perfectly circular and tightly wound coils. This is physics, no studies needed.
9) Speaker system.. analogy. Klopp: Laughs at this analogy, trying to make it look unscientific My Response: Again at the end of the video he admitted it is GOOD to simplify physics to explain things. Speakers are where signals are OUTPUTTED. This is a VERY GOOD analogy. In fact BEMER reps ALL The time say the BEMER signal is like music for the cells, so THEY ARE USING THIS METAPHOR TOO!!!
10) Macro and microcirculation. Klopp: Tries to dismiss macrocirculation studies My Response: Macro circulation IS DEPENDEND On good microcirculation. Klopp: Lowering peripheral flow of resistance lowers burden of the heart. My Response: I agree, but IMRS does this too.
11) Paying for Research Himself? Klopp: 2 years we have been studying iMRS and other units. Claims to have paid for research himself My Response: Really, you are paying for all that research yourself? Microcirculation Institute clearly states that it is a privately funded organization. You work for BEMER!! You are speaking at their conventions? You really want us to think you are unbiased and doing this for free??? LOL